Rambling again:
I was trying to provide accurate information, along with some personal opinion mixed in.
I attended several of the LD committee meetings as well as the Commission meeting of Jan 2nd. I’m a fairly objective person that tries to keep my bias in check, therefore I think I heard what was actually said. Sometimes we hear what we want to hear, and exclude the parts that don’t fit our particular agenda.
As far as some of the newspaper accounts are concerned. Someone asked me yesterday if the reporter writing most of the articles was the same person attending the meetings. I said it was, however it seemed after reading some of the articles, I wondered if I had been in the same meeting as the reporter. The person said that was why they were asking.
Anyway, my ramblings are just an attempt to set the record as straight as my own bias’ will allow. I’ve read a few opinions posted here that made me scratch my head, pucker up, an utter duhhhhhhh.
I agree that this is a real mess. and could end up in court. However, as I said previously, IMHO I doubt if the heir would prevail in a lawsuit to claim the property. Given the situation, what was the county to do anyway?
I’ll just close with this very very important unbiased rambling comment, yada yada yada.................
..........Learn to laugh people, it hurts less when you laugh about it.